GREEK AMERICAN ORGANIZATIONS' POLICY STATEMENT ON ECONOMIC AND MILITARY AID TO
TURKEY
WASHINGTON, DC—The American Hellenic Institute founder, Gene Rossides,
announced today that the major Greek American membership organizations
approved the policy statement on "Economic and Military Aid to Turkey" prepared by the American Hellenic Institute. These are: the Order of AHEPA,
the Hellenic American National Council, the Cyprus Federation of
America, the Panepirotic Federation of America, the Pan-Macedonian
Association of
America and the Evrytanian Association of America, the American Hellenic
Council of California and the American Hellenic Institute. The approved
statement on "Economic and Military Aid to Turkey", which is part of the 2004 Greek American Policy Statements follows:
Economic
and Military Aid to Turkey
The Administration's Iraq War Supplemental Appropriations Bill,
which passed the Congress on April 12, 2003, provided $1 billion
in economic aid to Turkey despite Turkey's failure to help the
U.S. when it counted most, and in the Fiscal Year 2004 Appropriations
Bill, Turkey received another $255 million in economic and military
aid!
The US, in its own best interests, should not give
economic and military aid to Turkey. The U.S. should publicly repudiate
Turkey’s illegal use of U.S. arms in Turkey’s invasion and continuing
occupation of Cyprus and in its actions suppressing the ethnic
Kurdish minority in southeastern Turkey and northern Iraq. The
U.S. should stop further sales or transfers of arms and military
technology to Turkey and should continue an arms embargo until
Turkey supports a democratic, workable, financially viable and
just solution to the Cyprus problem and demonstrates significant
improvement in its human rights record. Ceasing U.S. arms supplies
will contribute to a more rational allocation of Turkey’s resources, thereby bringing about badly needed economic
reform. Halting further arms sales or transfers will also eliminate
a stimulus for the regional arms race.
Since the 1980's
Turkey's brutal suppression of its Kurdish minority has been accomplished
with U.S.- supplied arms as documented in reports by the State
Department, the World Policy Institute, the Federation of American
Scientists, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International. The continuation
by the U.S. of arms to Turkey has made the U.S. an accessory to
Turkey's horrific human rights record against its Kurdish minority.
Similarly,
Turkey's illegal use of U.S.- supplied arms in its invasion and
continuing occupation of Cyprus, and the U.S.'s failure
to immediately halt arms to Turkey as required by U.S. law, and
the failure to denounce Turkeys aggression, as most nations did,
made the U.S. an accessory to Turkey's invasion of and occupation
in Cyprus.
Despite the end of the Cold War, Turkey has a military inventory far beyond its legitimate defense needs. Who is threatening
Turkey? Each year Turkey spends a disproportionately large amount
of its resources on its military. This not only reflects the military’s
deeply entrenched control over Turkish society, but also drains
away resources better spent on economic reform. The result is chronic
financial distress necessitating periodic requests for emergency
assistance from the International Monetary Fund, the World Bank
and the U.S. taxpayer.
The following are fourteen reasons
why the U.S., in its own best interests, should not give more economic
and military aid to Turkey:
- Turkey’s unreliability as a strategic
ally. Turkey’s actions opposing the use of Turkish bases by U.S.
troops to open a northern front against the Saddam Hussein dictatorship
demonstrated its unreliability as a strategic ally. The Turkish
military were key players in the "no" vote which put U.S. forces at risk. They thought we needed Turkey and that we
would give Turkey more dollars, a veto on policy regarding the
Iraqi Kurds and access to Iraqi oil. They miscalculated the U.S.
reaction.
- A senior administration official called Turkey’s actions "extortion in the name of alliance." (NY Times, 2-20-03; A1, col.6.)
- The fact that the U.S. opened a northern front
and defeated Saddam Hussein without Turkey demonstrated that
Turkey is of minimal values for U.S. strategic interests in the
Middle
East.
- Turkey’s continuing illegal occupation of Cyprus, now in
its 30th year, with over 35,000 Turkish armed forces and 100,000
illegal colonists from Turkey.
- It costs Turkey $1 billion annually
for its illegal occupation of 37.3% of Cyprus. Money is fungible.
Aid given to Turkey means that the U.S. taxpayer is subsidizing
Turkey’s occupation forces, the illegal colonists, and the
Denktash regime.
- Turkey’s horrendous human rights violations against
its citizens generally and in particular against its 20 percent
Kurdish minority.
- Turkey’s illegal blockade of Armenia.
- Giving
Turkey more money is rewarding disloyalty.
- Our huge deficit.
- Our substantial domestic needs.
- The facts as set forth by Eric
Rouleau in Foreign Affairs (Nov./Dec. 2000; at pages 110-112)
that the Turkish military has "tens of billions of dollars" in a cash fund and owns vast business enterprises including the arms production
companies of Turkey.
- The fact that Turkey owes the U.S. $5 billion.
- The fact that Turkey’s
U.S. foreign agents and publicists registered with the Department
of Justice have contracts totaling $2.4 million.
Since money is fungible, $2.4 million of any aid to Turkey
goes to these U.S. foreign agents and publicists from U.S. taxpayer
dollars.
- Defense Secretary Rumsfeld stated on April 18, 2003
that the Incirlik Air Base in southeast Turkey is no longer needed
to patrol the northern Iraq "no-fly zone" and that the U.S. has withdrawn nearly all the 50 attack and support planes
from Incirlik (NY Times, 4-29-03, A11, col. 6).
For the full text of our policy statements click here.
For additional information, please contact
Angeliki Vassiliou at (202) 785-8430 or at angeliki@ahiworld.org. For general information
on AHI, see our Web site at www.ahiworld.org.
Back to top
|